Thread: Buick Ranks Highest In Vehicle Dependability
View Single Post
Old 08/13/2007, 12:07 PM   #27 (permalink)
Jabber
*insert funny title*
 
Jabber's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Vehicle: 2003 Audi A6 2.7t quattro
Posts: 5,302
Jabber - if you don't know me, you must be newJabber - if you don't know me, you must be newJabber - if you don't know me, you must be newJabber - if you don't know me, you must be newJabber - if you don't know me, you must be newJabber - if you don't know me, you must be newJabber - if you don't know me, you must be newJabber - if you don't know me, you must be newJabber - if you don't know me, you must be newJabber - if you don't know me, you must be newJabber - if you don't know me, you must be new
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mav View Post
welcome to GM for the past 30 years (- the past 5).
let's not get crazy now. I have been doing this for 15 years. I spent from 93-2003 with GM products (chevy, buick, cadillac, olds). I can't remember a time with any of those brands when there was a waiting list to get the cars. If GM senses a hot product, they build the shit out of it, ship them to customers, and then the demand goes bye-bye. Then GM is forced to put rebates on them to get to sell so dealers will buy more. Toyota says we are going to build xx,xxx. If you are one of the customers that bought it, great. If not, well, there is always next year to get one.
Jabber is offline   Reply With Quote