Dyno Results of RS/GS/GT with diff mods - Page 3

3rdgenluder · 05/09/2007, 09:58 PM

wow this is a helpful thread and i feel pretty good about the number i put down...did a dynapack back in january

2000 gt
aem cai
magnaflow c/b
bosh plat +4 plugs
magnacore wires

3 runs and peeks were 183 hp 5539 rpm and 196 ft/lb at 4370 rpm

WarmAndSCSI · 05/13/2007, 05:58 PM

2001 V6 Galant
4 speed auto
RIPP Stage 3 SDS @ 16 PSI
RPW Shorty Headers
2.5" exhaust with Magnaflow HFC and Race Series muffler
GTS Plenum
6G74 Throttlebody

301 HP @ 6500 RPM
245 torque @ 6500 RPM

These numbers are at 4400' and 88 degrees on a Mustang Dyno without a weather station, so I look the liberty to correct the numbers for altitude and temperature:
364 HP @ 6500 RPM
296 torque @ 6500 RPM

bumpinclipse · 08/05/2007, 01:15 PM

ok. are you ready for the most disappointing 3g on the forum?

2001 GT sporty.
aem v2 intake
invidia catback

152.5 hp
173.7 tq

at 5142 rpm

Devin01RT · 08/09/2007, 07:19 PM

I'm sure when I ACTUALLY run mine it'll be much worse

bumpinclipse · 08/20/2007, 08:02 PM

i almost wonder if it was completely inacurate for mine, since it only went up to 5142 rpm. especially since hp and tq @5252 rpm are ALWAYS equal. according to import tuner.and there was such a huge gap at 5142. idk

toogood11 · 08/20/2007, 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bumpinclipse

i almost wonder if it was completely inacurate for mine, since it only went up to 5142 rpm. especially since hp and tq @5252 rpm are ALWAYS equal. according to import tuner.and there was such a huge gap at 5142. idk

the dyno will cross at that point, that doesnt mean it will be your peak hp.

youre numbers are so low because you have an auto.

eclipse_king2 · 08/26/2007, 03:07 AM

i am really trying to get a total engine upgrade for my 2000 eclipse i already have a cold air intake performance chip and dc header where should i shop for performance parts?

HIJACKER · 08/26/2007, 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eclipse_king2

i am really trying to get a total engine upgrade for my 2000 eclipse i already have a cold air intake performance chip and dc header where should i shop for performance parts?

Scroll down, vendors are at the bottom of the page.

CLIPSE_GT · 08/28/2007, 09:50 PM

2001 GT Sporty
89 degrees
Mustang Dyno

Stock run:
151whp/153wftlbs

Tuned and reflashed:
175whp/177wftlbs
Correction to Dynojet numbers (using 12% increase *who cares*)
196whp/198wftlbs

Still some more tuning to go. Thanks LogicGate for all the hours spent tuning.

Chato · 12/05/2007, 07:58 PM

Here is the sheet and a vid from the last time I put my car in the dyno.
2000 GT 5spd
Stock intake with cone filter
Magnaflow fart can
8.8.1 compression pistons
fidanza flywheel

YouTube - Chato's 3G in the dyno

ashbrooke29 · 01/18/2008, 02:48 PM

2001 gt sporty
50 degrees
I'm totally disappointed in my car
-ebay intake
-megan racing headers(no cat)
-custom 2.5 inch exhaust
-safc neo
163hp, 163tq

repforenzo · 01/18/2008, 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ashbrooke29

2001 gt sporty
50 degrees
I'm totally disappointed in my car
-ebay intake
-megan racing headers(no cat)
-custom 2.5 inch exhaust
-safc neo
163hp, 163tq

You just need to tune for the mods you have. The ECUFlash would be prefect. Those numbers are not that bad for a Sporty.

PhantomGTS · 01/27/2008, 04:22 PM

Yeah man if u reflashed I bet u'd see a huge difference. But that Sporty's gunna kill u

SlamminGT · 01/28/2008, 01:10 PM

I know most people do the ECU reflash after I/H/E, but I only have the intake and exhaust, would I see much of a performance increase from an ECU reflash?

*I really don't want to go through the hassle that comes with headers, that is why I really don't want to purchase them.

Devin01RT · 01/28/2008, 01:49 PM

I'm somewhat scared to see what mine are. I think what people are going to discover as time goes on is that Megan Racing headers don't really gain that much performance, hence being so cheap. I was stupid and jumped on the bandwagon ASAP and actually ordered a set for my christmas present; Only really noticed a slight throttle response, and not much more.

The tune however, has been the best thing on my sporty over all, Oh and Ashbrooke, aren't SAFCs a dumb idea to have with our cars, because of the fact our ECUs learn their way around everything, including intake/exhaust.

just my .02 cents though.

LogicGate · 01/28/2008, 06:09 PM

I think those numbers are not that bad, not the best though. I'm sure you can squeeze a lot more if you try tuning your car through ECU Flash.

What dyno did you go to?

repforenzo · 01/28/2008, 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SlamminGT

I know most people do the ECU reflash after I/H/E, but I only have the intake and exhaust, would I see much of a performance increase from an ECU reflash?

Damn right a stock car could benefit from the Flash. As other members have said, the true power is in the Timing maps. You need to know what you are doing, though.

SlamminGT · 01/29/2008, 01:08 PM

Well that is great to know!

I know someone that said they would give me a hand with it.

FireStorm4056 · 05/29/2008, 01:28 AM

I live in Denver (so I'm at roughly 5300ft elevation). In the next week or so I'll be ordering a Borla cat-back exhaust and RIPP long-tube headers.... so in a '00GT I'd expect to see around 160, MAYBE 170 WHP if I'm really lucky. Would that estimate be at all accurate? The regional threads are a bit slow, and seeing as this is the dyno thread, I figured it's a legitimate question.

jp1884 · 06/07/2008, 05:19 PM

Today I went to Dyno Jet for my Eclipse measure HP...

Here the results

Eclipse 2001 GT v6
Intake and Filter kyN

Max Power= 150.05 HP
Max Torque=165.06

Run Conditions+ 82,74 F
Humidity= 26%
SAE: 1.14 (I dont know what is this for)

I feel the horse power numbers were slow...
What do you think about it?

I was waitng a least 160 , 165

Or its ok just to have the intake and filter ??

thanks

02meclipsegt · 06/30/2008, 02:12 AM

I guess I can add mine in here.

02 GT M/T
196.5whp - 223.14wtq
3.5 swap, i/e, AEM alt pulley (doubt that did anything), Quaife LSD (not a power adder, but Ill add it), and ECU flash.

Runs 14.5 at the 1/4 mile. Mine is the Titanium one.

CloudINC00 · 06/30/2008, 02:20 AM

I'm almost embarrassed to post this, but since my new set-up (2008) is almost done, here goes nothing...

2006-2007 set-up:
2003 GS AT
stock motor @ 8psi via 16g with crappy piggy-back tune (never again will I go piggy back...)

ewww... look at that crappy a/f ratio

08/26/2007, 03:07 AM	#127 (permalink)
eclipse_king2 Junior Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 1	help i am really trying to get a total engine upgrade for my 2000 eclipse i already have a cold air intake performance chip and dc header where should i shop for performance parts?

08/28/2007, 09:50 PM	#129 (permalink)
CLIPSE_GT Da cone is ur friend Aqua Slug Champion! Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Cleveland, OH Vehicle: 2001 Eclipse GT PP Posts: 11,423	2001 GT Sporty 89 degrees Mustang Dyno Stock run: 151whp/153wftlbs Tuned and reflashed: 175whp/177wftlbs Correction to Dynojet numbers (using 12% increase who cares) 196whp/198wftlbs Still some more tuning to go. Thanks LogicGate for all the hours spent tuning. __________________ 2001 GT PP A/T 205whp/203wft-lbs *Tuned by LogicGate, Sponsored by Tearstone*

12/05/2007, 07:58 PM	#130 (permalink)
Chato Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Ft. Walton Beach, FL Vehicle: 00 Eclipse GT-T Posts: 1,362	Here is the sheet and a vid from the last time I put my car in the dyno. 2000 GT 5spd Stock intake with cone filter Magnaflow fart can 8.8.1 compression pistons fidanza flywheel YouTube - Chato's 3G in the dyno __________________ Rudeness is a weak person's imitation of strength.

06/30/2008, 02:20 AM	#142 (permalink)
CloudINC00 GS-Turbooo Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Jacksonville, FL Vehicle: 2003 Eclipse GS-T Posts: 1,826	I'm almost embarrassed to post this, but since my new set-up (2008) is almost done, here goes nothing... 2006-2007 set-up: 2003 GS AT stock motor @ 8psi via 16g with crappy piggy-back tune (never again will I go piggy back...) ewww... look at that crappy a/f ratio __________________ Cloud: 2003 GS-T ZeroType.org Last edited by CloudINC00; 06/30/2008 at 02:25 AM.

05/09/2007, 09:58 PM	#121 (permalink)
3rdgenluder Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: palmhell CA. Vehicle: 2000 eclipse gt Posts: 77	wow this is a helpful thread and i feel pretty good about the number i put down...did a dynapack back in january 2000 gt aem cai magnaflow c/b bosh plat +4 plugs magnacore wires 3 runs and peeks were 183 hp 5539 rpm and 196 ft/lb at 4370 rpm

05/13/2007, 05:58 PM	#122 (permalink)
WarmAndSCSI Banned Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 648	2001 V6 Galant 4 speed auto RIPP Stage 3 SDS @ 16 PSI RPW Shorty Headers 2.5" exhaust with Magnaflow HFC and Race Series muffler GTS Plenum 6G74 Throttlebody 301 HP @ 6500 RPM 245 torque @ 6500 RPM These numbers are at 4400' and 88 degrees on a Mustang Dyno without a weather station, so I look the liberty to correct the numbers for altitude and temperature: 364 HP @ 6500 RPM 296 torque @ 6500 RPM

08/05/2007, 01:15 PM	#123 (permalink)
bumpinclipse Junior Mint Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Green Bay, Wi Vehicle: 2001 Eclipse GT Posts: 206	ok. are you ready for the most disappointing 3g on the forum? 2001 GT sporty. aem v2 intake invidia catback 152.5 hp 173.7 tq at 5142 rpm

08/09/2007, 07:19 PM	#124 (permalink)
Devin01RT Banned Cocknozzle Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Jacksonville,Florida Vehicle: 2001 Dodge Stratus R/T Posts: 1,925	I'm sure when I ACTUALLY run mine it'll be much worse

08/20/2007, 08:02 PM	#125 (permalink)
bumpinclipse Junior Mint Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Green Bay, Wi Vehicle: 2001 Eclipse GT Posts: 206	i almost wonder if it was completely inacurate for mine, since it only went up to 5142 rpm. especially since hp and tq @5252 rpm are ALWAYS equal. according to import tuner.and there was such a huge gap at 5142. idk

01/18/2008, 02:48 PM	#131 (permalink)
ashbrooke29 Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Greensboro NC Vehicle: 01 gt sporty Posts: 122	2001 gt sporty 50 degrees I'm totally disappointed in my car -ebay intake -megan racing headers(no cat) -custom 2.5 inch exhaust -safc neo 163hp, 163tq

01/27/2008, 04:22 PM	#133 (permalink)
PhantomGTS Night Phantom GTS Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Springfield, Illinois Vehicle: 2003 Eclipse GTS Posts: 260	Yeah man if u reflashed I bet u'd see a huge difference. But that Sporty's gunna kill u

01/28/2008, 01:10 PM	#134 (permalink)
SlamminGT Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Concord, North Carolina Vehicle: 2001 Eclipse GT Posts: 850	I know most people do the ECU reflash after I/H/E, but I only have the intake and exhaust, would I see much of a performance increase from an ECU reflash? *I really don't want to go through the hassle that comes with headers, that is why I really don't want to purchase them.

01/28/2008, 01:49 PM	#135 (permalink)
Devin01RT Banned Cocknozzle Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Jacksonville,Florida Vehicle: 2001 Dodge Stratus R/T Posts: 1,925	I'm somewhat scared to see what mine are. I think what people are going to discover as time goes on is that Megan Racing headers don't really gain that much performance, hence being so cheap. I was stupid and jumped on the bandwagon ASAP and actually ordered a set for my christmas present; Only really noticed a slight throttle response, and not much more. The tune however, has been the best thing on my sporty over all, Oh and Ashbrooke, aren't SAFCs a dumb idea to have with our cars, because of the fact our ECUs learn their way around everything, including intake/exhaust. just my .02 cents though.

01/28/2008, 06:09 PM	#136 (permalink)
LogicGate Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Orlando, FL Vehicle: 2001 Eclipse GT Spyder Posts: 1,599	I think those numbers are not that bad, not the best though. I'm sure you can squeeze a lot more if you try tuning your car through ECU Flash. What dyno did you go to?

06/30/2008, 06:02 PM	#143 (permalink)

01/29/2008, 01:08 PM	#138 (permalink)
SlamminGT Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Concord, North Carolina Vehicle: 2001 Eclipse GT Posts: 850	Well that is great to know! I know someone that said they would give me a hand with it.

05/29/2008, 01:28 AM	#139 (permalink)
FireStorm4056 Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Denver, Colorado Vehicle: '00 Eclipse GT Posts: 137	I live in Denver (so I'm at roughly 5300ft elevation). In the next week or so I'll be ordering a Borla cat-back exhaust and RIPP long-tube headers.... so in a '00GT I'd expect to see around 160, MAYBE 170 WHP if I'm really lucky. Would that estimate be at all accurate? The regional threads are a bit slow, and seeing as this is the dyno thread, I figured it's a legitimate question.

06/07/2008, 05:19 PM	#140 (permalink)
jp1884 Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: San Jose, Costa Rica Posts: 50	Today I went to Dyno Jet for my Eclipse measure HP... Here the results Eclipse 2001 GT v6 Intake and Filter kyN Max Power= 150.05 HP Max Torque=165.06 Run Conditions+ 82,74 F Humidity= 26% SAE: 1.14 (I dont know what is this for) I feel the horse power numbers were slow... What do you think about it? I was waitng a least 160 , 165 Or its ok just to have the intake and filter ?? thanks

06/30/2008, 02:12 AM	#141 (permalink)
02meclipsegt 02 GT MT 3.5L Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Orange County, CA Vehicle: 02 MItsubishi Eclipse GT Posts: 167	I guess I can add mine in here. 02 GT M/T 196.5whp - 223.14wtq 3.5 swap, i/e, AEM alt pulley (doubt that did anything), Quaife LSD (not a power adder, but Ill add it), and ECU flash. Runs 14.5 at the 1/4 mile. Mine is the Titanium one.