Mitsubishi Eclipse 3G Club banner

will gt's kill these cars STOCK.

3.1K views 33 replies 16 participants last post by  rthor234  
#1 ·
If the gt and these cars are both bone stock who wins?

rsx? not type s
civic si?
celica gt?
integras?
tuberon gt ?

just curious
 
#12 ·
He's probably referring to the Racing Forum rules, which state:
DON'T ASK US IF WE THINK YOU'LL WIN. This is the "racing" forum, not the, "will I beat X, with these hekka mods on my car", or, "how would these cars do against each other?", forum. - Sam
While that's just one sub-division of the Driving & Driving Tech Forums, those guidlines are generally accepted throughout. Still, I think you're within your rights in asking this question here... :dunno:
 
#8 ·
Yes, theoretically. Most of these cars are 4Cyl. With the stock GT and GTS making 200 to 210 hp, the 3G would win. But, the Tiberon GT is actually in the class and a lower lighter in weight, so you may have trouble with it. I have personally embarassed rsx's, civics, celicas, and integras with slight modifications. The only problem I found is the torque steer pulling off the line. Secondly, you must take into account the driver. The fastest car doesn't always win.
 
#16 · (Edited)
Ekklips'd said:
But, are you saying a Tiberon GT (V6) is slower than a 4 cyl.
No, I would never say something like that [/sarcasm]



The Cavy Z24 would give you just as good a run as the Tiburon for sure, but you still shouldn't have much trouble with it at all.
 
#30 ·
Gearing has nothing to do with the overall power required... Gearing is just what it takes to get that power to the wheels.

Here's how you figure it out:

x = 1/2at^2 <- solve for a. t is your target time.
the
F = ma <- compute F with the a you got from above and the mass of the car.

W = Fd <- the distance (x) in the first equation is the d in this one.

P = W/t <- put in the W from above and your target t.

I converted everything to metric to make it easier (standard SI units are so much easier to work with), and then just converted the P from Watts back to HP.
 
#31 ·
Ah well I dont know any equations and such, but my experience is that shorter gears, such as a 4.10:1, are much quicker than taller gears, such as the 2.93:1 rear end.

So you are saying that the final drive doesnt affect the 1/4 mile time and as long as the vehicle has 163.5 whp and weighs 2900 it will run close to 15.5 regardless of the ratio?

Sorry I just dont understand, I apologize.